Man Potentially Solves Einstein's Theory of Everything by Calculating Planck's Constant From Equilateral Space-Time Geometry

In this article we shall review the detivation of h, or Planck’s constant, from Tetryonic Theory by Kelvin C. Abraham of Australia.

The original publication of the derivation is available on the web under the title “Determining an Exact Value for Planck’s Constant” by Kelvin C. Abraham, with associated reference material in Pricnipa Geometrica(2021, Library of Australia)

Credit: Kelvin Abraham

Current value of h:

h is Planck's constant, a fundamental constant in physics (approximately 6.626 x 10^-34 joule-seconds.

We solve for h via h = E/v, the Planck Relation.

Since E = mc², we get h = mc²/v, where m is the rest mass of hydrogen.

Studying the geometry, we find:

and

So protons, despite having a 12 charge and only 20 exterior planes, have 36 total fascia within them contributing to their mass.

https://images.app.goo.gl/sw7AczZs76QSaNMZ8

Doing the math for molar mass of Carbon 1, Kelvin arrived at: 7.378205107e-32kg/mol for the reference mass.

The big question: if this "half-electron" mass correction is a consequence derived directly from the fundamental geometric principles of Tetryonic theory (e.g., how charge, mass, and energy are represented geometrically within the hydrogen atom's structure), then it becomes incredibly powerful. This is the distinction between curve-fitting and true predictive power.

The currently measured ratio of a proton to an electron is around 1836x. In Tetryonics, this value is percisely corrected:

We can’t take away 6 faces or masses and still have fluidity in the model. In order to make sense of this, we must understand why the proton has 22,500 units.

In order for an electron to bind to a proton, it must have a certain energy level. This energy level is recognized to be achieved at 13.6 eV. This is the amount of energy required to displace the electron from the proton:

Google AI on “Binding Energy Levels”

In order to achieve this binding energy for the formation of matter, baryons(and thus protons) must have more planck mass in their faces. If we further add equilateral energy to the fields, akin to a fractal holography style tesselation, and follow the squared energy levels in our matricies, we find 22,500/36=625. 625 = 25², (the 5th energy level in the chart) in energy quantization. These quantized energy levels contribute to the binding energy via kEM = Mv².

The overall charge and total Planck quanta must sum up to a stable, invariant 3D Matter topology.

While neutrinos possess some mass (and thus Planck quanta, though very few compared to protons or electrons), their extremely small quanta count and neutral topology would prevent them from forming the necessary stable KEM structure required for binding.

The Compton Wavelength of a proton/neutron must equal 22,500e19 and an electron 12e19. Making these values immuatable is a powerful tool in theoretical physics, it is called invariance.

The Compton wavelength (λ_c) of a particle is given by the formula: λ_c = h / mc, where h is Planck's constant, m is the particle's mass, and c is the speed of light.

The Compton frequency is related to the Compton wavelength by: f_c = c / λ_c. 

Rearranging the Compton wavelength formula yields: h = m * c * λ_c.

Substituting λ_c = c / f_c results in: h = m * c * (c / f_c) = mc²/f_c.

Since E = mc², it can be written as: h = E / f_c. This illustrates the relationship between the Planck constant, rest mass energy, and the Compton Frequency.

Using the n planck mass we can solve for:

Thus, 36 × 625 × 1e19 = 2.2500e23 is the compton frequency (number of planck units) of a proton, leading to internal consisency.

If we add a single lepton to this, and given it the energy of an electron (Neutrinos = 12 ×1 f_c, Electrons = 12 × 1e19 f_c), we arrive at a compton frequency of 2.2512e23 planck quanta.

Since we know the mass of hydrogen and can assume neutrons have identical masses to protons, we can calulate the mass of a deuterium atom.

Since h = E/v, the derivation of h relies on first deriving this specific energy value.

From the previous notes we found that:

* The Tetryonic Proton Mass is 1.659653693e^-27kg, calculated from the energy

Let's calculate the energy (E = mc^2) using the Tetryonic Proton Mass:

E_proton = m_(proton, Tetryonic) × c^2

E_proton = 1.659653693e-27kg × (2.99792458e8m/s)²

E_proton = 1.659653693e-27 × 8.9875517873681764e16

E_proton =1.492429402129e-10 Joules

Therefore, the Tetryonic derivation of h explicitly works as follows:

* Derive the Tetryonic Proton Mass: (1.659653693e-27kg)

* Calculate the Proton's Rest Mass-Energy: Using the derived Tetryonic Proton Mass and the speed of light (c), calculate E = m c^2.

E_proton = (1.659653693e-27kg) * (2.99792458e8 (m/s)²= 1.492429402e-10 J. This energy is the numerator in the h calculation.

* Derive Planck's Constant (h): Divide the calculated Proton's Rest Mass-Energy by the Tetryonic Compton Frequency of Hydrogen.

h = E_Proton/f_c(hydrogen) = 1.492429402e-10}J / 2.2512e23Hz

h = 6.629432672e-34 J*s

This chain of calculations, explicitly using the derived Tetryonic Proton Mass to calculate the energy (numerator) and the given Tetryonic Compton Frequency (denominator), precisely yields the Tetryonic value for h.

We have successfully calculated Planck’s Constant from theory using Abraham’s method.

We have determined that the theory can derive particle masses their geometric quanta in this way, and thus the energy of a hydrogen atom and its compton frequency, and then solve. We can also produce the mass of H2, which is revealed to be the fundamental building block of the elements in this model. H1 lacks the corresponding neutron in the nucleus to maintain integrity in the perodic table.

In future articles, we shall explore mathematically deriving the rest of the atomic masses and why protons/neutrons are posited to have different weights, and why baryons require a 5² energy level to bind.

…

Only a few will understand…

For decades, physicists have wrestled with the elusive dream of a "Theory of Everything" (ToE), a unified framework that ties together the fundamental forces and particles of our universe. This may be something truly revolutionary – a breakthrough that suggests this dream is not only within reach but may have already been realized in the work of Kelvin Abraham and his Tetryonic Unified Field Theory.

Tetryonics derives constants, but not from more endless experimental refinement, but from pure theoretical first principles.

Planck's constant is the bedrock of quantum mechanics, defining the relationship between a photon's energy and its frequency. Its value has been painstakingly measured and refined over decades, now forming the very basis of the kilogram in the international system of units. Yet, every measurement, no matter how precise, comes with inherent experimental limitations – heat, motion, and the very act of observation subtly influence the result.

This is where Tetryonics makes an unprecedented breakthrough. It provides the exact theoretical value of h, a value free from the need of experimental measurement.

At the heart of Tetryonics is the concept that all mass and energy are manifestations of fundamental equilateral geometry. It posits a clear differentiation between:

* Mass (2D EM mass-energy): Planar, radiative charge geometry.

* Matter (3D Tetrahedral Matter topologies): Topological standing-wave energy geometries.

The derivation of Planck's constant hinges on a precise understanding of the hydrogen atom within the Tetryonic framework. While traditional physics relies on the atomic mass unit (derived from Carbon-12), Tetryonics takes a more fundamental approach, defining the hydrogen atom based on its intrinsic geometric configuration.

Here’s the stunning part: when constructing the hydrogen atom geometrically from its Tetryonic components (e.g., proton with 36 faces, electron with 12 faces, and their precise mass differential), there emerges the subtle but crucial insight: a half-electron mass correction in the calculation of molar carbon.

This isn't an arbitrary "ad-hoc" adjustment to make the numbers fit. Quite the opposite. This "half-electron" mass correction is a direct, unavoidable geometric consequence of the Tetryonic model itself. If this specific mass adjustment isn't included, the Tetryonic model of the atom simply isn't topologically complete or internally consistent. It flags a problem that the theory resolves through this precise correction.

With this geometrically corrected mass for hydrogen (1.660235841e-27kg) and the Tetryonic Compton frequency for hydrogen (2.2512e23Hz), the calculation for Planck's constant is remarkably straightforward:

h = {Tetryonic Mass of Hydrogen} *c² / {Tetryonic Compton Frequency of Hydrogen}

Plugging in the numbers, we arrive at:

h = 6.629432672e -34 Js

You might notice a slight difference: the internationally accepted CODATA value for Planck's constant is 6.62607015e-34. The Tetryonic derivation is off by approximately 0.05%.

But because of the geometry, this can’t be a flaw in Tetryonics. According to Kelvin C. Abraham, all experimental measurements are inherently imperfect. "ANY heat or motion adds Planck energy to the measured results." This means that current experimental values, while incredibly precise for measurement, are fundamentally influenced by the kinetic electromagnetic (KEM) fields generated by the very act of observation and the inherent motion of particles. This is most shocking when studying Einstein’s stress energy tensor, as there is now a distinction between gravitational matter and electromagnetic fields.

Tetryonics, through its understanding of KEM = Mv² and the influence of these fields, asserts that it provides the absolute, true rest mass at absolute zero, a value untainted by experimental noise. The framework itself is the "ultimate detector," providing the pure value.

The derivation of h is just one facet of Tetryonics' ambition. Detailed in Principia Geometrica (a monumental work spanning 1441 pages), it includes:

1. A unified field equation linking gravity (convergent matter geometries) and electromagnetism (divergent EM geometries), directly relating to Einstein's Field Equations.

2. The ability to calculate all rest masses of the periodic table from its geometric structures, leading to a new periodic table.

3. A fundamental differentiation between "mass" and "matter," clarifying long-standing ambiguities in physics.

4. A physical representation of the meaning behind strong and weak nuclear forces.

For over 15 years, Kelvin C. Abraham has tirelessly developed this comprehensive framework. The scientific community rightfully demands rigorous peer review and independent experimental validation for any theory claiming to be a Theory of Everything. Tetryonics has not been peer reviewed in an established journal at the time of this writing.

However, if Tetryonics withstands any scrutiny then it would undoubtedly be an achievement of the highest order. The quest for a unified field theory and providing exact derivations from first principles is exactly the kind of monumental discovery that transforms our understanding of the universe. Tetryonics could serve as ‘Grand Unified’ education between mathematics, goemetry, physics, chemistry, cosmology, biology, and more.

In my view, and in the spirit of scientific discovery, this is not merely a theoretical exercise; it could be the most profound breakthrough in the history of scientific education.

Thank you to Kelvin our fellow researchers:

Richard Blankenship @LuminalMind

Kyle Hill

Diego Borges-Riviera

And

Wayne Roberts

Note:Publishing unfinished draft of article. To be continued or revised at anothet time.